Skip to content

Not So Deadly Sin Thesis Statements

A StubbornThings Symposium11/29/15
Latest: Let’s Chew the Fat About Sloth by Anonymous  •  Introduction  •  I don’t really feel like writing a lengthy introduction. That’s too much damn work. So let’s get right to the essays…if anyone really has the energy to write them. I, for one, would rather just sit here and vegetate. If you send one in, I’ll put it up…if I feel like it.

The Editor


Seven Deadly Sins:Sloth


 

TIMOTHY LANE

The degree to which each of us is guilty of each of the Seven Deadly Sins varies. In my case, I’m probably least inclined to Envy, and most inclined to Gluttony Anger, and Sloth. It’s time to discuss this last one.

The problem with sloth is that — barring an inherited fortune or good luck with the lotteries — it generally is a severe limitation on one’s ability to earn money. A slothful individual is unlikely to become wealthy, which isn’t a problem if one can accept the consequences. But many people combine sloth with envy of those who are more “fortunate” (i.e,, harder working), and that’s a toxic combination. This is especially true if one is so slothful that earning anything at all becomes impossible. Many welfare recipients no doubt are merely unfortunate, but many are simply lazy — and willing to live on the freebies available to them. This can be a better living than a minimum-wage job provides — and without having to work for it. That makes it . . . dare I saw it? . . . very tempting.

Of course, sloth can lead to other problems. A house that’s a total mess, lack of personal hygiene, uncooked meals of snacks (or eating out all the time, which gets expensive – unless you go with fast food all the time, which can have its own problems). It also means an extremely sedentary lifestyle, which can lead to health problems. And unless you inherited a lot of money from someone who doesn’t care how lazy you are, you can’t afford most of these options anyway.

A certain amount of laziness can be survived (after all, I’ve managed to survive it). But it’s best, as with all the Seven Deadly Sins (and any others), to keep them at manageable levels. I can still remember once doing some routine work at a summer job, completely unsupervised. I did it routinely, but I did it — and was very pleased that I hadn’t given in to any temptation to shirk the work. Until then, I couldn’t be sure how i would behave in such circumstances. Of course, it helps when one gets paid. An honest day’s pay for an honest day’s labor is one way to keep sloth from becoming too severe.

Necessity may be the mother of invention, but sometimes it can also be the father of resistance to temptation.

— Timothy Lane writes from Louisville, Kentucky and publishes the FOSFAX fanzine.

 

BRAD NELSON

I think all of The Seven Deadly Sins are controversial. And not just because the modern diabolical, corrupt, and vulgar Left has turned many of them into virtues. Normalizing sin is as old as . . . sin.

What I’m talking about is the difficulty of making distinctions. One man’s “sloth” is another man’s “quiet time.” Who is to decide? Is it all just relative? And if it is, well, that’s a controversial opinion, particularly on a conservative site.

I won’t talk in the third person and do masturbatory intellectualizing. I know I have a tendency to vegetate. But the thing is, when something interests me, I will expend enormous amounts of energy. Sloth may overcome me in terms of washing the few dishes that are in the sink. But yesterday I climbed a small snow-covered mountain. That’s no big deal. I’m in shape for that. But the hard part was that the snow had turned to slush and it was the devil to try to get any footing.

I wonder if “sloth” is often a term used disingenuously by other people when they are trying to get us to do their crap. Sometimes you sign up for that crap, as with the duties that go with your job or your family. But even so, a lot of dishonesty can be hidden in “sloth” when what other people mean is “He or she won’t do my bidding at the speed that I want.”

Now, if you’re living in your own filth, if your bathroom isn’t reasonably clean, if you haven’t bathed lately, if you haven’t even been outside lately, then you could be objectively guilty of sloth. Even so, when does “lazy” end and “psychological problems” start? Many people do enormously slothful things, but not because they’re lazy, per se, but because they’re a little cuckoo. It’s the human condition to be just a little cuckoo. Some people have more than their share, of course.

And let’s acknowledge that there are high-energy “type A” people…the kind for whom going to a constant series of “Yes, you can!” seminars by the latest sales-expert gurus is their thing. “Sloth” isn’t even on their radar, although given their annoying habits, maybe it ought to be. And, yes, there are people who are very active and do well with this level of activity. Donald Trump, for instance, didn’t get to be Donald Trump because he had a penchant for quiet moments and navel gazing.

But some people do. Some are not type A. Some people’s idea of entertainment is to read a good book, do a little gardening, or something else that isn’t as outwardly “productive” or showy as those non-slothful people who, if you ask me, should ease off a bit on their quad-shot-espresso lifestyle. I’m no fan of people who are dirty bums, but I have no problem with people who require a little less drama in their lives and who can stop and smell the roses without obsessing over how to make money with them. I don’t find too many of those types, but in theory they do exist.

So who made “sloth” a Deadly Sin anyway? It was probably some woman who was inventing a new way to nag her husband. As for me, I’ll admit that sometimes there are duties we must buck-up to, no matter how we feel. But I suspect that “sloth” is a label often thrown around with the purpose of manipulating other people.

— Brad Nelson is editor and publisher of StubbornThings.org. He is a sinner but assures you that he “did not have sexual relations with that woman…not a single time.”

 

ANNIEL

THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS AS SET FORTH IN PROVERBS 6:16-19
#6. A False Witness that Speaketh Lies, KJV; A False Witness Testifying Lies, TANAKH; A False Witness Who Speaks Lies, Peshitta.

False Witnesses abound on a daily basis around us. Lies of personal destruction are laughed at as character and lives of good people are willfully destroyed without a thought of wrong-doing or consequences. As Harry Reid said, “I won, didn’t I?” The only thing that matters.

Speaking lies is bad enough, but the TANAKH translates the word as “testifying,” making the action a legal, and more serious, matter. Harry Reid should have been hauled into court by Mitt Romney.

I began these entries by not understanding which sin was the most abominable to the Lord. I’m certain now that it is indeed the Seventh and that all other sins are acted out in order to complete the overall goal of the 7th.

The COMPLETE Rules of the Seven Deadly Sins

The Rule of the First Deadly Sin: By their haughty look ye shall know them.

The Rule of the Second Deadly Sin: The Lying Tongues blanket the whole land in Deceit.

The Rule of the Third Deadly Sin: In all ages the blood of the innocent is shed by those who want to sow discord among the people.

The Rule of the Fourth Deadly Sin: The Hearts and Minds of the Leaders turn first to dreaming of, then planning and promoting evil.

The Rule of the Fifth Deadly Sin: The Feet of Makers of Mischief and Evil run swiftly when opportunity arises.

The Rule of the Sixth Deadly Sin: Bearing False Witness is a Tool always used by those who sow discord.

The Rule of the Seventh Deadly Sin: This is the Sin the Lord abominates most because it is not just personal, it is the Umbrella under which the other six operate to destroy whole civilizations and peoples.

— Anniel is a frequent contributor to StubbornThings. Her frequency saves her from the appellation of “sloth.”

 

JON N. HALL

The Nanny State versus Adipose Rex

In sterner eras, certain choices and behaviors were regarded as Deadly Sins. Two of those fatal transgressions were Gluttony and Sloth. Nowadays it might be difficult to get up a quorum to decide on whether Gluttony and Sloth are even undesirable, much less sinful. You see, that would be a “value judgment,” and no one wants to be accused of that. That’s because nowadays judgmentalism really is a sin.

Whether sinful or not, Gluttony and Sloth play a big part in the price of healthcare. One of the big problems with the price of healthcare is that we have an “unlimited” demand for products that are in limited supply. You know what classical economics says about that: prices will rise.

One classical solution to the problem of rising prices is: reduce demand. If more people were healthy, there’d be less demand placed on the healthcare system. Most folks can get healthy simply by changing their “lifestyle”: their daily choices and behaviors. Degenerative diseases due to lifestyle are unnecessary, self-inflicted “diseases of choice,” and they run up healthcare costs for everyone.

America leads the world in “morbid obesity.” Not only do we eat too much, but we eat the wrong kinds of food. We’re even seeing clogged arteries in children. What might be called “chronic inactivity” is also a problem; Americans just don’t get enough exercise. There are other factors that come under the rubric of “lifestyle” that don’t involve the essential activities of eating and moving; they include tobacco use, drug abuse, alcoholism, and other types of dissipation. And these lifestyles also contribute mightily to the cost of degenerative disease.

If health insurance companies still operated like insurance businesses, they would charge higher premiums to those individuals who pose the most risk, such as obese, sedentary, alcoholic chain-smokers who drive too fast and are addicted to cocaine and corn chips. But under ObamaCare, insurance companies can’t charge them more. That’s because of “community rating,” which requires that everyone pays the same for health insurance, regardless of how much risk they pose.

“Moral hazard” is a concept long used in the insurance business. The idea concerns this: by removing the costs and consequences of risks, folks are more apt to take risks. If someone else pays, that creates moral hazard. The insurance business deals with moral hazard by putting consequences back in the equation through higher premiums. For example, if one gets caught speeding, one’s car insurance premiums will likely rise. Such tactics create incentives for the policyholder to change his risky behavior by making him share in its costs. But ObamaCare forbids raising premiums on those who pose higher risks.

The ultimate threat for reducing moral hazard is the possibility that an insurance company might cancel one’s insurance policy. But ObamaCare forbids that, as well. In fact, “no lifetime or annual limits” on the dollar value of benefits are allowed (see page 131 of the text of ObamaCare).

The demand for healthcare is “unlimited” because there is an “unlimited” number of ways that one’s health can go bad. It should be especially alarming in America, a nation predicated on the idea of a limited central government, that a new federal program places demands on the private sector (businesses and individuals) that are essentially unlimited.

ObamaCare requires the responsible, prudent, taxpaying adults among us who “delay gratification” and regularly save and invest for the future to subsidize (with higher taxes and premiums) certain behaviors they would never countenance in themselves. Democrats think that a man who leads a life of dissipation should be able to check in at the nearest emergency room and get free healthcare. And you’re supposed to welcome him like he’s “some long-lost retard relative, shows up at your door in a wheelchair with a colostomy bag, says he’s yours now” (page 22 of The Drop, a novel by Dennis Lehane and a good flick).

But, if government can demand that some Americans buy health insurance for themselves as well as pay for the healthcare of those who either can’t or won’t buy health insurance, shouldn’t government also demand that those being subsidized improve their “lifestyle” and get healthy so that those who are paying won’t have to pay so much?

If America had a government-run, single-payer healthcare system, government would command us to diet and exercise, and would lay a penalty on us if we didn’t. Of course, someone would challenge that in court. And when it got to the Supreme Court the robed justices would descend from Mt. Olympus to tell us that the command is really a choice, and that the penalty is really a tax, and that the law is therefore really constitutional, (see NFIB v. Sebelius).

So will the ObamaCare bureaucrat busybodies issue new regulations that command us to do “the right thing” and start taking care of our health so that healthcare costs don’t spiral further out of control? They won’t because they can’t, and that’s the “dirty little secret” of ObamaCare. The government can’t constantly be monitoring everybody to ensure that we’re taking care of our health; i.e. ensuring that we eat our spinach and walk our five miles each day. Such monitoring would involve a mammoth bureaucracy; just what kind of fascist police state are you willing to put up with, anyway? We’ve been down this road before, during Prohibition, and that didn’t work out so well.

Besides, people have a right to be unhealthy. They have a right to eat whatever the heck they want, and in super-sized portions. They have a right to lounge on their sofas all day eating bonbons, listening to Oprah assure us that “this is the One.” They have a right to gorge on trans-fats, swill booze, smoke cigarettes, and dip snuff, and to their hearts’ content. And if it ruins their health and costs the taxpayer a fortune, that’s just too bad; after all, they didn’t set up the system.

Folks aren’t going to change their “lifestyle” just so some utopian government healthcare system can be made workable. And if the feds try to take away the few remaining pleasures in our dreary little lives here in Obamaland, there’ll be hell to pay and a nice revolution to boot. People have a right to be irresponsible as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else, so pass the salt, Nanny Bloomberg.

What the utopians don’t seem to understand and will probably never accept is that the rest of us — the jogging, tofu-eating, responsible rest of us — shouldn’t have to finance bad behavior by paying the medical bills of the boozers, smokers, drug addicts, gluttons, and couch potatoes. It’s like demanding that we subsidize sin.

For each of us, biological life is a sinking boat that has a seating capacity of one. Even so, progressives expect some of us to paddle over to other sinking boats and bail them out, even while our own boats are sinking. And the occupants of those other boats sit back and watch us bail out their boats for them and complain that we’re not working fast enough and, hey, your boat’s bigger than mine.

I’m not sure that analogy works entirely, but if you’re 5’ 6” and have weighed 300# for the last 30 years and your most strenuous physical exercise is hunting for the TV remote, then you pay for your hip replacement yourself, and all the other medical interventions coming your way; it’s not my problem. Your use of the healthcare system is becoming just a wee bit too gluttonous.

There’s no cure for any of this, other than getting healthy. And that’s what those of us with a proper “lust for life” are trying to do, despite the little snag of Lust being a Deadly Sin.

Happy New Year!

— Jon N. Hall is a programmer/analyst from Kansas City. He would have submitted this essay earlier but was being a little slothful.

 

TIM JONES

The Pro and Con of Sloth

I am going to go a little off script and not write completely about the sinfulness of sloth for StubbonThings’ Symposium on The Seven Deadly Sins, but take a little bit of the other side as well. It’s going to be a little bit of both “pro” and a lot of “con” regarding the sin of sloth. And the reason I’m doing so is that I happen to think there’s nothing all that wrong with being lazy, but that it’s a matter of perspective and context when describing where and when it actually exists.

To begin, here’s a brief description on the origins of what motivates people to work and be productive citizens. Most walk it back to TheProtestant Ethic, that to work hard was a virtue set forth by God in honoring Him. Max Weber outlined it in his seminal book, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, that could be seen as a reflection of the emerging industrial societies where “time became money” and it became honorable and virtuous to work in order to accumulate capital. Weber put his finger on these beginnings when writing his book on the modern work ethic that helped fuel the growth and development of today’s western societies by making the connection to religious underpinnings in order to justify the new materialism.

But as everyone knows, the antithesis of hard work, slothfulness or laziness, has been around for a long time as described in the Bible and known as of one of The Seven Deadly Sins. The strongest personification for slothfulness being sinful can be found in the quote “Idle hands are the devil’s workshop.” Idleness creates a vacuum, that is, when one is not working what usually follows is trouble and mischief which in turn will lead to other more egregious sins that are self-destructive as well as destructive to others.

The best example today can probably be found in the huge numbers of black teenagers and men living in urban centers with no education, no strong family ties, and no motivation to work in order to sustain themselves and most likely any children they may have had out-of-wedlock. What you have is the untold number of lives who will never be productive citizens, possibly becoming gang members, and committing crimes of all varieties. One need look no further than the city of Chicago to see what slothfulness has created as it is literally like the Wild West in its ghettos where shootings are a daily occurrence.

I read somewhere that all of The Seven Deadly Sins are derived from the first two of The Ten Commandments …

  • You shall have no other gods before Me
  • You shall not make idols

… and that they are all a form of self-worship or idolatry of the self. Sloth is definitely representative of that since it’s just another form of pleasure, the pleasure that comes from being selfish by not working and seeking the momentariness of feeling good and instant gratification. Drug use personifies the statement “idleness is the devil’s workshop” as nothing is more sinful and destructive, especially against God. The drug epidemic throughout the world is the apotheosis of sloth. By doing only what feels good with all of one’s time can only lead to one thing in all of its manifestations, and that is hedonism.

Consider all of the ancillary problems that come from drug use and abuse. You have the organized crime and corruption that comes with the major drug cartels growing and selling cocaine, heroin, and marijuana (which is still illegal in most states). You have the crime that comes with its distribution throughout American cities that is most likely the biggest contributor to inner city violence. You have it contributing to the destruction and breakdown of families where addiction takes over one’s responsibilities and obligations. That in turns leads to domestic abuse and divorce. Death by overdose can’t be overlooked either.

The nihilism of illegal and even legal drugs, primarily the the epidemic of painkiller abuse and addiction, is at the core of the loss of faith in God and purpose, all of which can be traced back to the sin of sloth. Hedonism is simply the breakdown or absence of discipline of a materialistic, pleasure-seeking, Godless society.

Without discipline and the ethic of hard work, the Bible tells us what will happen:

Proverbs 28:19A hard worker has plenty of food, but a person who chases fantasies ends up in poverty.

And…

Thessalonians 3:10Even while we were with you, we gave you this command:“Those unwilling towork will not get to eat.”

As for making the case for sloth, there can be a difference between being intentionally lazy and just doing nothing, although it can be a very fine line between the two. The downside of modern society is that it’s become too frenetic in what’s commonly called ‘the rat race’ where everyone works so hard that it has led to an epidemic of stress, anxiety and burn-out.

Society has become totally bifurcated, either one is working or one is not from Monday through Sunday. This may sound simplistic but something seems really wrong when most of the population lives for the weekends where they can indulge in their personal pleasures and hobbies in order to escape the maladies of the workaday world. I recently heard a brief interview where a television reporter asked an Amish man what he does for fun and his reply was simply: ‘work’.Not exactly what you would hear from your typical American worker.

Now there are many that find great pleasure in their work but I would argue that the vast majority feel a certain degree of alienation from their work, that they dread getting up to go to their places of work, especially on Monday mornings when the 40-hour work week starts all over again as does the countdown of days until Friday’s arrival.

So I think one can be lazy, but lazy in a responsible way. As I indicated earlier, there is always something that fills one’s time when one is not working. Most seek personal pleasure whether it’s in their hobbies or other recreational activities, but there’s also the quiet time of doing nothing that can restore the soul such as reading, writing and reflecting.

I personally admit a weakness in watching too much television but I try to stick to the cable news and other informational networks rather than the ones with the usual sitcom and drama offerings. I believe one’s education doesn’t stop with the end of high school or college but is an endeavor that should be pursued every day and done with the curiosity and the desire to always be learning something new about the world. Television can be a great educational tool rather than the mindless and addictive vice it’s become for so many people. So with sloth, laziness, or whatever you want to call it, with the right attitude, motivation and discipline, a person can avoid the real sins of being slothful.

On balance, sloth as sin greatly outweighs any positive attributes. The discipline to work and to be motivated is in slow-motion deterioration. We have become the ‘entertainment society’ where the goal is to do what is pleasurable or fun. Even many churches have absorbed the overwhelming power of “fun” in order to avoid being boring so as to attract more attendees. They end up just marginalizing themselves. The pastor at my church peppers his sermons with recent stories out of our popular culture in order to be relevant and cool. It’s not the job of the Church to be either in my opinion.

The entertainment society generates a sense of desire for the good life and especially for those in the underclass whether in the inner cities or rural areas. This in turn creates a sense of fear of missing out, or FOMO, an acronym coined by bloggers and amateur psychologists in describing a negative ‘side effect’ of using social media. One can understand the power of images spewed out day in and day out of “the good life” throughout all forms of media, especially advertising, that can make one feel like they’re missing out on something that will always be out of reach.

So in the end the sin of sloth leads to both boredom and a fear of missing out, especially when society’s primary values are ones of pleasure: entertainment, recreation, and instant gratification. Everything then comes full circle in an ironic way. These values in turn encourage and promote the vices of sloth when following the word of God vanishes into oblivion and the consequences are harmful, if not devastating, for everyone.

— Tim Jones is a contributor to StubbornThings and his New Year’s resolution is to be more productively slothful.”

 

PAT TARZWELL

Late to the Sloth Party

Well I see I have been slothful again and I am late to the party…so late that it is the next year. So here goes. How does being lazy become a Deadly Sin? Just like all the rest, there is more to this than just simply being lazy, or over-eating, or getting angry, or lusting after your spouse…you get the point. I’ll ask the question again: How does sloth become deadly?

There is a pattern that links all of the Deadly Sins together as one. It certainly has to do with the level at which you partake in them, but there is more. All of these, and maybe this sloth thing in particular, point to a battle that goes on in the hearts of men; do we give in to temptation or not? We all know the “lead us not into temptation line”; but God does not lead into it at all. No, there is another power or someone else that rules over the earth at this time and it is from that power or person that we are lead into temptation.

We all by our very nature would tend to be lazy if we can. But God tells us to work. (“If anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat.” — 2 Thessalonian’s 3:10.5). If we do not fight our nature and we do not work, we will die, because we will not eat. To throw this into the political realm, the Left seems to be controlled by this power or person that tempts us. And if they are not controlled by it, they sure are affective at using all of these Deadly Sins against us.

Take welfare, for example. Once you fall into the trap of being slothfully entitled, it is almost impossible to ever recover and become a productive member of society. This may not become deadly over night, but I believe it is a great start to all of the other Deadly Sins, kind of a gateway drug if you will. What are the things that every human needs (from the male perspective anyway)? Food, sex, and shelter.

Lust comes into play because #1 and #3 are taken care of for you, so why not just have sex all the time?

Gluttony, well if you do not have to pay for it, why not dig in?

Greed, because you know you are stealing from the labor of someone else, and their efforts to take care of themselves and their own family, what better definition of greed can you get than continuing to steal what you did not earn?

Pride, you are entitled to be lazy and worthless, so proud in fact you do not recognize that what you are doing as stealing; be proud of that, no shame allowed. You’ll be full of wrath for anyone that thinks that just because you are able to work you should have to work, (those haters).

Envy, that’s right, look at those rich people, they do not deserve to have such nice things, take it from them. I do not want to stand out, so let us make more slothful folks so I can feel “normal,” however I chose to define normal.

Any one of these may not seem Deadly. But all combined, in the end, our society will die and us along with it if we allow these things to continue unchecked. Not to mention the fact that these are things God has told us will lead to just this end.

— Pat Tarzwell was born conservative, runs a successful hi-tech business, and lives a red-state life in a deep blue one.

 

ANONYMOUS

Let’s Chew the Fat About Sloth

When the topic of sloth came around, I was tempted to throw in my two cents, because I’ve had some enlightening experiences on the subject that I don’t think most people ever get to have. But I was reluctant, because in order pass on those experiences, I have to reveal some things about myself that I’m less than comfortable sharing in a public forum, even under a nom de plume.

But then Jon Hall’s essay appeared, and I felt compelled to provide another point of view.

Let’s start by getting a couple of personal items out in the open. First, I’m fat. A big ‘ol tub-o-lard. I’m not going to be on one of those Discovery Channel circus side shows, but it’s certainly my defining physical characteristic. Second, I’m crazy. I don’t hear voices, but I do suffer from debilitating mental problems. It’s a weird place to be that I don’t think you can understand until you’ve experienced it. I’m totally in touch with reality, and fully aware of when I’m being irrational, but the fear and dread associated with doing certain routine things is overwhelming.

I want to start with the fat issue, because it is similar to, and at least partly, though not totally, connected to an overall energy level, or sense of drive that a person has. And a low energy level, in the minds of many, equates to sloth – and is therefore a character flaw. And worse than that, an intentional, selfish, and correctable character flaw – if only they’d get off their fat lazy ass. And their ass is fat only because they are too lazy to diet.

I have three cousins, brothers, same mom and dad. The dad is from my side of the family. He’s one of the slimmer of my relatives, but spent a lifetime working in a steel mill and still constantly diets. Mom is thin – very thin. The three brothers are peas in a pod. They all played the same sport. They were dedicated, practiced hard, and were pretty good at it. They all were in marching band. And Boy Scouts. Nearly clones of each other in most every respect. Except the oldest and youngest were always skinny, while the middle one dwarfs me. He’s easily 400lbs.

I have two pet guinea pigs. One is kinda chubby. The other is very small. Guess which one steals food from the other. If you said that chubby pig was the glutton, you’d be quite wrong. Guess which one runs the most at play time. If you said the little one, you’d be wrong again. I’ll point out that the chubby pig is very calm, while the little one is nervous and fidgety.

If you’ve been watching TV lately, you’ll notice that Oprah is shilling for Weight Watchers. In fact, she recently purchased a substantial part of the company’s stock. She’s a Weight Watchers customer, because, obviously, she’s fat. Love her or hate her, one thing you can’t say about Oprah is that she is a sloth. Beyond what must be an incredibly level of daily activity, Oprah could certainly have a personal trainer and personal chef available at a snap of her fingers.

Clearly, there is more going on with a person’s weight than a poorly developed sense of personal responsibility. The ready availability of food without slaving hours in the kitchen, and the change of employment, and even personal chores, from physical to cerebral, are obvious factors.

Being crazy, I’ve been prescribed a number of psychoactive drugs. It’s a very trial and error process to find something that helps. Sometimes the results are not at all what is expected or desired. Side effects are ubiquitous. Two of the most common side effects of psychiatric drugs are weight gain and fatigue. In many cases, these are quite severe. I’ve known people who gained well over 100lbs. I was spared this. I’ve always been heavy, but fortunately, nothing I took made it worse. On the other hand, some of the drugs I have taken left me almost unable get out of bed and function.

I’ve always been a low energy person, and my experiences with those drugs were extreme, but familiar. I’ve always wondered how the Thomas Edisons and Oprahs and Trumps of the world did what they did. I wished I could, felt like a loser because I couldn’t, but I could never muster that kind of motivation for more than a short burst.

Then, I met Adderall, a.k.a. amphetamine salts. OMG. Now I understood. It was the most amazing and eye-opening thing I have ever experienced. I could not sit down. I could not stop working. I could not procrastinate. I would cross something off the to-do list, and instead of wanting to rest, I HAD to do another, and another. Unfortunately, I also could not sleep. And sometimes I could not tear myself away from what I was doing until my bladder was going to explode. Side effects again. It was a short lived nirvana. But man, what a rush. I’m told that this is appeal of cocaine, but I can’t personally attest.

The point is that we are all different. One man’s sloth is another man’s daily struggle. While we are not completely at the mercy of our genes and our surroundings, they are big factors. I could never be a ballerina, or a pro football player. Most ballerinas or football players likewise could never had had the success I did in my profession, before my mind snapped. My strengths, to a large degree, come from a lifelong interest and intense study in my field. But I never would have had that interest and passion in something I sucked at.

As far as sloth goes, the goal is to make the best of what you have. But until you’ve walked a mile in another man’s shoes, don’t automatically assume that he isn’t making the best of what he has. I wouldn’t wish my psychiatric problems on anyone. But to experience, even for a little while, good and bad, what other people must have been born with, has been priceless.

See Also:
The Seven Deadly Sins: Lust
The Seven Deadly Sins: Gluttony
The Seven Deadly Sins: Greed
The Seven Deadly Sins: Pride
The Seven Deadly Sins: Wrath
The Seven Deadly Sins: Envy • (2680 views)

This entry was posted in Symposium. Bookmark the permalink.

Trust me when I say that nothing worthwhile will ever happen if you remain inside your comfort zone. As Albert Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.” Yet so many people live their lives this way.

They go to jobs they hate so they can afford to buy more things they don’t need to impress people they don’t and expect something to change somewhere along their regular routine.

Remember, you have so much to gain by giving it all up. Keep only the things that bring you joy and give away as much as you can. De-cluttering your life will also de-clutter your mind and bring you one step closer to your nomadic life.

Sloth

There is a reason why the “become a millionaire in a week” scams still exist.

It’s because as a society we want everything to require a minimal effort, while still achieving big results, and most importantly we want everything to happen as quickly as possible.

Remember the weight-loss diet that promised you that you would lose 30 pounds in 30 days by wearing a belt that’ll shake your belly fat while you watch Dance Moms and eat pizza? Much like that, chances are you won’t achieve your dream of a nomadic life without putting in the work.

I find this oddly comforting mainly because I’m a bit of a paranoid parrot. I generally follow the “if it seems too good to be true, it probably is” rule, especially while working online. I actually find courses that promise to get you results quickly and effortlessly really demotivating. This is because when your results take longer than what was promised you end up feeling like crap. I’d rather know what I’m in for at the very beginning so I can prepare myself.

So, though sloths are super cute, your journey to the perfect nomadic life won’t be easy, but it will make it that much satisfying when all of your hard work pays off.

But… seriously, how great are sloths?

Wrath

I actually really struggled with this one.

Mainly because I don’t think hate, anger or any of the traditional behaviours that come under this sin category really apply to being a freelancer or digital nomad. Or at least they didn’t to me.

That’s when I realised that I was looking in the wrong place. This category may not pertain to but certainly remains relevant with respect to other people’s reaction to me “coming out” as a freelancer chasing the happy and free nomadic life.

I had a lot of negative backlash from people in my life to my decision to live a freedom lifestyle. I had some of the most important people in my life calling me a quitter and an aimless dreamer amongst other things.

It feels like crap, but it really shouldn’t hold you back from achieving your dream life. It certainly didn’t stop me.

People will have different reactions to the events in their life; reactions that even they may not fully understand. It might even come from your own family as they aren’t going to like having a long distance relationship with you. That’s to be expected and is surprisingly completely irrelevant. What is relevant is your response to their reactions. is everything.

Using doubt as a powerful motivational tool and dedicating your efforts to proving everyone wrong is one way of handling this kind of situation. It’s not easy, trust me. It’s completely natural to go on the defensive and feel hurt when people question your decisions.

The is to let their anger and disapproval get to you. Keep in mind, a lot of this negative backlash is just a display of fear. People will fear for your financial stability, career progression or whatever else they may deem as important aspects of life.

They mean well, give them the benefit of the doubt and try to move past it – because your dream of a nomadic life depends on it.

Envy

How many times have you had this conversation with your friends:

You: *scrolls through Instagram, photo of beautiful famous travel blogger or Doug the Pug, sheds tear*

Friend: “What’s wrong?”

You: “How come there are people out there getting paid to travel the world and dogs in hot dog costumes that make more money than me?”

I worked at a travel agency so this may have been more common in our office than most. But on some we have all been envious of online celebrities (human or not). But only a very small percentage take that envy further and find ways of achieving similar levels of success. Sometimes you just have to get pissed off and put the “I could do that” attitude into action, because trust me you definitely can do it, but it might take a bit more than strutting in a hot dog costume to get there!

The beauty of the internet is that anything is possible (like millionaire dogs example, do they even know they’re rich? I’d like to think so). The point is – we all feel envy sometimes, you want to use it to push you forward and set it as a benchmark for what you want to achieve.

Remember that everyone has the same number of hours in a day, what you do with those hours is entirely up to you.

Pride

Who else was told by their high school guidance counsellor that higher education would solve all their problems? I know I’m not alone in this.

Absolute rubbish. I have no regrets about going to university because ultimately, in a really roundabout sort of way – it brought me to exactly where I was supposed to be, right here.

I’m also not trying to bag on higher education here, not at all. However, let’s just agree that at the age of seventeen or eighteen, you are not prepared to choose one direction of study, leading to a career which you will then stick with for the rest of your life.

It’s almost like the ‘high school sweetheart’ effect. There are some amazing couples out there who have been together for sixty years since their first year of high school.

The reality for many others, however, is that from high school onwards it is unlikely that you will both grow separately and together in a way that complements each other’s likes and dislikes… for the rest of your lives.

Choosing your profession of choice at the age of seventeen is exactly like that.

Can you really expect that fifty-year-old you, will still have the same aspirations as you did thirty years earlier?